-
How to get started
- General set-up
- DMA & ESRS
- EU-Taxonomy
- CO2-Footprinting
- Supply Chain Sustainability
- VSME
-
ESRS
- ESRS - Overview
-
DMA Double Materiality
- The Double Materiality Proc...
- Start or import your Double...
- Add and manage stakeholders
- How to involve stakeholders...
- Which stakeholders to invol...
- Select your relevant sustai...
- Add the impacts, risks and ...
- Upload IROs into the DM pro...
- Assess each impact, risk an...
- Step-by-Step: How to Create...
- Understand your Double Mate...
- Set common definitions for ...
- Consolidation / Determinati...
- Change materiality levels o...
-
DMA Double Materiality - IR...
- Agriculture and Farming
- Forestry
- Construction and Engineering
- Energy Production & Uti...
- Water & Waste Services
- Casinos & Gaming
- Leisure Facilities
- Capital Markets
- Banking
- Insurance
- Health Care
- Food & Beverage Services
- Hotels & Lodging
- Aerospace & Defence
- Automobiles & Other Tra...
- Biotechnology & Pharmac...
- Building Products & Fur...
- Chemicals & Biofuels
- Construction Materials
- Electronics
- Food & Beverages
- Machinery & Equipment
- Medical Equipment & Ser...
- Metal Processing
- Oil & Gas - Midstream &...
- Pulp, Paper & Wood prod...
- Textiles, Apparels, Footwea...
- Tobacco
- Toys, Sporting Goods & ...
- Coal Operations
- Gap Analysis
-
ESRS Data Collection & ...
- Create a new ESRS report
- Include Your Double Materia...
- ESRS report, step 1: determ...
- ESRS report, step 1 (1): om...
- ESRS report, step 2: prepar...
- ESRS report, step 2 (1): Da...
- ESRS report, step 2 (2): Di...
- ESRS report, step 3: collec...
- ESRS report, step 4: writin...
- Mapping of Sustainability T...
- Analysis & Dashboard
- Guide to Handling Requests ...
-
VSME
-
VSME Data Collection & ...
- Create a new VSME report
- VSME - Basic Module
- VSME - Comprehensive Module
- VSME report, step 1: Determ...
- VSME report, step 2: Prepar...
- VSME report, step 2 (1): Da...
- VSME report, step 2 (2): Di...
- VSME report, step 2 (3): Us...
- VSME report, step 2 (4): Co...
- VSME report, step 3: collec...
- VSME report, step 4: writin...
- Reusing ESRS Data for Your ...
- Sustainability Profile
-
VSME Data Collection & ...
-
EU Taxonomy
- Data collection
- Eligibility assessment
- Minimum safeguards
- Alignment assessment
- Adding financial data for E...
- Accounting standards
- Analytics & Reporting
-
CO2 Footprint
- Data Collection
- Activities
-
Scopes
- Scope 1 - Emissions from so...
- Scope 2 - Emissions that re...
- (2) Scope 2-Emissions: Mark...
- Scope 3.1 - Emissions assoc...
- Scope 3.2 - Emissions assoc...
- Scope 3.3 - Emissions resul...
- Scope 3.4 - Emissions assoc...
- Scope 3.5 - Emissions assoc...
- Scope 3.6 - Business Travel
- Scope 3.7 - Employee commuting
- Scope 3.8 - Emissions resul...
- Scope 3.9 - Emissions gener...
- Scope 3.10 - Emissions gene...
- Scope 3.11 - Emissions gene...
- Scope 3.12 - Emissions gene...
- Scope 3.13 - missions resul...
- Scope 3.14 - Franchises
- Scope 3.15 - Investments
- Emission factors
- Dashboard
- Target Setting and Scenarios
-
Supply chain risk
- Module settings
- Supplier management
- Risk assessment
- Grievance mechanism
- Incidents
- Reporting
- Information for suppliers
- Guide to Handling Requests ...
-
General settings and config...
- Account Settings
- Log-in process
- General User Management
- Data requests, review and v...
- Reporting Structure
-
Product updates
-
Software Updates
- EQS-Updates 22. May 2025
- EQS-Updates 15. May 2025
- EQS-Updates 9. May 2025
- EQS-Updates 2. May 2025
- EQS-Updates 25. April 2025
- EQS-Update, 18 April 2025
- Software update, 4 April 2025
- Software update, 27 March 2025
- Software-Update, 14 March 2025
- Software update, 7 March 2025
- Software update, 26 Februar...
- Software update, 20 Februar...
- Software update, 18 Februar...
- Software update, 11 Februar...
- Software-Updates, 4 Februar...
- Software updates, 27 Januar...
- Software updates, 21 Januar...
- Software updates, 13 Januar...
-
Software Updates
How to get started with the DMA
Modified on Wed, 22 Jan at 3:48 PM
Every company reporting in accordance with the CSRD must carry out a double materiality analysis (DMA) as a mandatory step in defining the scope of the report. The dual materiality analysis requires companies to assess sustainability aspects from two perspectives: how they affect the company's financial performance (financial materiality) and how the company's business activities impact the environment and society (impact materiality). This ensures a holistic assessment that covers the entire spectrum of a company's sustainability footprint. The result of the DMA is a list of sustainability topics and their associated materiality level, which then determines which disclosures and data points must be reported in accordance with the ESRS.
On Daato, the double materiality analysis takes place as part of the ESRS module. Here you can see how to get there:
Regarding the creation of the materiality analysis on Daato, there are two options: either you conduct it entirely using Daato, or you import results from an externally conducted materiality analysis.
Importing External Materiality Analysis (Results):
If you conducted a materiality analysis outside of Daato, you can import the results and the entire documentation as follows:
After clicking New Report in the materiality analysis view, select Import Report.
Report Import Functionality:
Selecting the Import Report option opens a sidebar.
Users can download a template with the following columns:
- Standard: List of standards with their category (Environmental/Social/Governance), e.g., Environmental: Climate. Additional options:
- Environmental: Company-specific
- Social: Company-specific
- Governance: Company-specific
- Sustainability Topic
- Impact Materiality: Not material | Very low | Low | Medium | High | Very high
- Explanation of Impact Materiality
- Financial Materiality: Not material | Very low | Low | Medium | High | Very high
- Explanation of Financial Materiality
The template comes pre-filled with all standard sustainability topics (only the first two columns are filled).
Language Support:
If your tool's language is set to German, the template will be downloaded with all column names, choices, and pre-selected sustainability topics in German.
Spreadsheet Validation:
When uploading, the spreadsheet is validated. If rows contain errors, an error message will display the row numbers with validation issues. Upon successful validation, users can submit the file.
Additional Documentation:
Users can upload additional documents via the Upload Documentation field.
Report Creation:
Once the spreadsheet is completed, and both it and any additional documents are uploaded, a new materiality analysis will be created for the year specified in the year selection dropdown of the import template.
The materiality analysis includes:
- All sustainability topics marked as relevant in Step 1.
- Company-specific topics created by users and assigned to the correct category.
- No IROs.
- Assessments of sustainability topics overwritten based on spreadsheet values, as if manually entered via the existing drawer (table view in Step 4).
- All additional documents saved with the report.
Post-Import Processing:
After successfully processing the import:
- A success message will display: "Report successfully imported" (or translation).
- The report overview will be updated in the frontend.
- If additional documents are included, they will be added, and a Download Documentation option will appear in the Download dropdown menu in Step 4. The button label for Download will change to Actions.
Completion:
Once the report is created, all steps are completed.
Process of double materiality analysis
The ESRS and EFRAG DMA Implementation Guidance prescribe specific steps that need to be taken to determine impact and financial materiality. At Daato, we have integrated these steps into a simple workflow. First, relevant sustainability topics are identified. These are then assessed for their impact and financial materiality by documenting and evaluating impacts, risks and opportunities (IROs).
The process on Daato works as follows:
You can see what this looks like on the software in the following video:
Involving stakeholders
Before we dive into the different steps of the materiality analysis, you should create your stakeholders in Daato to involve them during the materiality analysis. Stakeholder engagement is highly recommended in the ESRS. It is crucial for accuracy and relevance when assessing impacts and financial materiality.
For the materiality of impacts, consulting directly affected stakeholders ensures that the real impacts on people and the environment are taken into account. This improves the accuracy of the assessment, verifies sustainability data and strengthens community trust. For financial materiality, engaging users of sustainability reports (investors and regulators) ensures compliance with regulations and alignment of sustainability practices with market expectations, which helps to manage risk and maintain competitiveness.
You can see how to create stakeholders in the software here:
In the following process steps, we will point out when which stakeholders need to be involved.
Step 1: Determining relevant sustainability topics
The starting point for the materiality assessment is to define the list of relevant sustainability topics for the double materiality analysis. To do this, you identify sustainability topics relevant to your company through research, reviewing competitors' sustainability reports or consulting widely recognised sustainability data providers or standard setters, such as MSCI Materiality Maps or SASB Materiality Finder. It is important that you consider all your own entities and locations as well as all relevant value chain partners, such as suppliers, consumers, etc.
To support reporting companies, the ESRS (ESRS 1 AR 16) propose a comprehensive list of potentially relevant sustainability topics:
The complete list is often referred to as the "long list" and serves as the starting point for the double materiality analysis. This list should now be supplemented by additional, company-specific sustainability topics, i.e. topics that are not yet on the list but are relevant for the reporting organisation. Subsequently, the topics that are not relevant to the reporting organisation can be excluded from the list, resulting in a shorter, so-called "medium list".
You can also involve relevant stakeholders in this step to provide support. This works via a survey function that allows stakeholders to rate the topics on a scale from very low to very high, while also suggesting topics to be excluded. They can also suggest further company-specific topics. You can see how this works here:
Stakeholders you should involve are as follows:
Internal:
Own workforce: Provides insights into social factors such as working conditions, equal treatment, opportunities and sustainability issues.
External:
Workers in the value chain: Help define environmental and social issues along the value chain, such as material waste, emissions, child labour and forced labour.
Business partners: Suppliers, distributors and partners provide information on sustainability goals and challenges.
NGOs: Provide expertise on environmental and social issues that are important to the organisation.
Affected communities: Share concerns and priorities related to sustainability issues.
Consumers/end users: Provide feedback on packaging, sustainable products and company practices.
Step 2: Identify IROs
Based on the medium list, impacts, risks and opportunities (IROs) are now identified and assigned to each of the topics. This is the starting point for assessing the impact (inside-out perspective) and financial materiality (outside-in perspective) of the sustainability topics from the previous step.
When identifying the IROs, their names and descriptions should be as precise as possible so that all stakeholders involved understand the full scope and consequences and can apply the same considerations to the assessment.
For example, instead of just listing the impact "Contribution to global warming", a company should be more specific and document the impact as "Contribution to global warming from CO2 emissions from steel production in the upstream value chain".
This is how the process works on Daato:
A list of generally relevant IROs is automatically suggested on Daato. These serve as a starting point, but must be adapted to the context of the reporting company.
Stakeholders you should involve are as follows:
Internal:
Own employees: Provides information about internal processes and their impact on society and the environment.
External:
Trade unions & social partners: Provide insights into labour-related opportunities and risks.
Investors: Provide feedback on ESG issues that are critical to long-term growth.
Business partners: Help to understand opportunities and risks along the value chain.
Step 3: Evaluate IROs
Before you start the materiality analysis of IROs, it is necessary to specify their type by providing more details on each of them. Here you can see what should be specified:
This is followed by the centrepiece of the DMA, namely the materiality analysis of each IRO. To perform this analysis, specific information must be provided for each IRO and a materiality level is calculated.
To carry out this assessment pragmatically using the software, open an IRO, specify further details about the type of IRO and then answer the assessment questions. You can see how this works in the following video:
If you are collaborating with colleagues on the assessment of IROs, Daato also offers the option of storing definitions for all users involved. This is done via the settings. For example, the assessment of financial materiality in particular, i.e. risks and opportunities, should be based on the company's internal risk management processes. So if certain sales thresholds are used as the basis for risk levels, these should also serve as the basis for assessing the expected financial impact. The following video shows you how to set up the definitions:
Step 4: Analysing the results
The end result of the double materiality analysis is a "short list" of sustainability topics that are considered material to your organisation, along with their associated materiality level. These are used to define the scope of ESRS reporting, but are also very useful to guide sustainability departments and help them determine a sustainability strategy.
After completing the assessment of all IROs, the materiality calculation runs automatically. To analyse the results, you can now jump to the last step "Report". There you can see the material sustainability topics and relevant IROs in various view options. You can see what this looks like in the following video:
You can also use the settings to define threshold values for materiality. These then define which topics are included in your ESRS report and determine which disclosure requirements and data points must be reported.
At the same time, you have the option of manually adjusting the materiality level of the sustainability topics. As you can see in the video, open the topics in the table and use the action menu to adjust the level of impact or financial materiality and leave a justification. This may be necessary if you have more information than our software because you may have consulted stakeholders outside the tool.
Consolidation in the context of the dual materiality analysis
The EFRAG Implementation Guidance on dual materiality analysis suggests that an organisation operating in different sectors must assess which impacts, risks and opportunities (IROs) are most material to the group as a whole, including all subsidiaries, sites, etc. However, neither the ESRS nor the guidance provide a standardised process for this, as different companies have different needs, but suggest two approaches.
This is how it works:
- Role of the parent company: The parent company assesses the material impacts, risks and opportunities for the entire group, regardless of its structure.
- Approaches:
- Top-down: the parent company assesses the entire group and consults the subsidiaries on specific issues.
- Bottom-up: Each subsidiary assesses its own impact and the results are summarised at Group level.
- Consistency and trade-offs: The parent company must balance different severity levels of impacts (e.g. a high severity issue from a small revenue source vs. a medium severity issue from a large revenue source). It must ensure consistent methodologies and thresholds across the group.
- Sector and location considerations: The company should consider common IROs for its sectors and locations and use sector standards to identify and assess these factors.
In summary, the parent company conducts a materiality analysis for the group, using either a top-down or bottom-up approach, ensures consistency and considers specific sector and location impacts.
To find the right approach for your organisation, Daato suggests first asking yourself the question: "Do we have business activities in our group that are very different from each other, e.g. are different subsidiaries or business units operating in completely different sectors?"
- If the answer is no, the simplest approach is to perform a "top-down" double materiality analysis, taking into account the opinions of the subsidiaries where helpful.
- If the answer is yes, the simplest approach is to perform separate dual materiality analyses for the different subsidiaries or business units and then aggregate the results.
In the latter case, bear in mind that the scope of the ESRS report, e.g. the relevant disclosure requirements and data points, can be very comprehensive - but not all of them are reportable for all subsidiaries. If certain topics are only material for certain subsidiaries or business units, data on these topics can only be reported by these subsidiaries or business units.
Documentation for audit purposes
An important consideration guiding the entire DMA process: proper documentation. This is an essential element to ensure audit readiness. Here is an overview of the relevant documentation to be presented:
Daato automatically documents the items marked with the blue tick and the Process & Methodology documentation is available to share with the auditors.
Was this article helpful?
That’s Great!
Thank you for your feedback
Sorry! We couldn't be helpful
Thank you for your feedback
Feedback sent
We appreciate your effort and will try to fix the article