Double Materiality Assessment under the ESRS Simplified Draft

Modified on Tue, 28 Apr at 10:41 AM

The ESRS Simplified Draft was published by EFRAG as part of the Omnibus initiative. The aim of this draft is to significantly simplify the existing ESRS requirements and make them more practical for companies.

As part of this draft, changes have also been made to the methodology of the Double Materiality Assessment (DMA). These affect both the structure of sustainability matters as well as the assessment logic and the overall analytical approach. This article explains the key changes and their impact on conducting the DMA in the Sustainability Cockpit.



Important: The ESRS Simplified Draft is currently still in draft status. Further changes to its structure and methodology are possible.



Overview: What is changing?

Compared to the ESRS Delegated Act 2023, the DMA under the Simplified Draft is:

  • less granular
  • methodologically simplified
  • more strategically oriented

The main changes relate to:

  • the structure of sustainability matters
  • the assessment of impacts (severity)
  • the handling of time horizons
  • the methodological approach (top-down vs. bottom-up)



1. Sustainability matters: Simplified structure

The sustainability matters under the Simplified Draft are based on ESRS 1 Appendix A.

Compared to the Delegated Act:

  • sub-sub-topics have been removed
  • several topics have been merged
  • overall complexity has been reduced

Examples:

Detailed sub-topics such as
“Working conditions – adequate wages” or “work-life balance” are no longer assessed separately.

Social topics in particular have been significantly consolidated.




2. Simplified assessment of severity

A key change concerns the assessment of impacts. Previously, this was based on the criteria scale, scope and irremediability – all three had to be assessed together.


Under the Simplified Draft: Each criterion can independently determine materiality.


From a logic perspective, this means: Materiality can already be triggered if a single criterion exceeds the defined threshold



3. Time horizons become optional

Previously, specifying time horizons (short-, medium-, long-term) was a mandatory part of identifying an IRO.


Under the Simplified Draft: The time dimension is optional. It is only required if relevant for the assessment. 


Impact in the tool: IROs can be created without assigning a time horizon



4. Shift towards a stronger top-down approach

The Simplified Draft introduces an important conceptual shift in how the DMA can be conducted. In addition to the traditional bottom-up approach, a top-down approach is now explicitly supported and strengthened.

Under the top-down approach, materiality is not primarily derived from individual IROs, but instead assessed at the level of sustainability matters.

This involves analysing overarching factors such as:

  • the company’s business model
  • its strategic direction
  • relevant sectors
  • geographic areas of operation
  • the structure of the value chain

Based on this analysis, companies can already form a well-founded view of which sustainability matters are likely to be material.

A combination with the bottom-up approach remains possible.



Top-downBottom-up
Starts at topic levelStarts with individual IROs
Strategic perspectiveDetailed assessment
Faster overviewHigher level of detail




What do these changes mean for conducting the DMA?

Overall, the Simplified ESRS Draft leads to a noticeable streamlining of the Double Materiality Assessment – not only in individual methodological aspects, but across the entire process.


Where the previous approach was strongly focused on identifying and assessing as many individual IROs as possible in detail, the new approach enables a more targeted and pragmatic execution. The emphasis shifts towards efficiently identifying and prioritising relevant issues, rather than ensuring maximum granularity across all potential topics.


At the same time, the assessment itself becomes more flexible. Companies can rely more on well-founded expert judgement without necessarily having to perform detailed quantitative analyses for every aspect. This is particularly beneficial in early stages of the assessment or where data availability is limited.


Finally, the DMA becomes more closely aligned with the actual business context. The focus is on those topics that arise from the company’s business model, activities and operating environment, and that may lead to significant impacts or financial risks and opportunities.


In practice, this means a more focused, efficient and business-oriented DMA that concentrates on what truly matters.

Was this article helpful?

That’s Great!

Thank you for your feedback

Sorry! We couldn't be helpful

Thank you for your feedback

Let us know how can we improve this article!

Select at least one of the reasons
CAPTCHA verification is required.

Feedback sent

We appreciate your effort and will try to fix the article